Dentalcare logo

Gérer l’érosion dentaire : Connaissances actuelles et directions futures

Numéro du cours: 517

TÉLÉCHARGEZ LE COURS (PDF)

Passer l'examen

Ressources et références supplémentaires

  1. O’Brien M. Children’s Dental Health in the United Kingdom. Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. London. Her Majesty’s Stationary Office. 1994.

  2. Nunn JH, Gordon PH, Morris AJ, et al. Dental erosion - changing prevalence? A review of British National childrens' surveys. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2003 Mar;13(2):98-105.

  3. Linkosalo E, Markkanen H. Dental erosions in relation to lactovegetarian diet. Scand J Dent Res. 1985 Oct;93(5):436-41.

  4. Wiktorsson AM, Zimmerman M, Angmar-Månsson B. Erosive tooth wear: prevalence and severity in Swedish winetasters. Eur J Oral Sci. 1997 Dec;105(6):544-50.

  5. Lussi A, Schaffner M, Hotz P, et al. Dental erosion in a population of Swiss adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1991 Oct;19(5):286-90.

  6. Wiegand A, Muller J, Werner C, et al. Prevalence of erosive tooth wear and associated risk factors in 2-7-year-old German kindergarten children. Oral Dis. 2006;12(2):117-124. doi:10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01167.x.

  7. Ganss C, Klimek K, Giese K. Dental erosion in children and adolescents--a cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation using study models. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Aug;29(4):264-71.

  8. Lussi A, Carvalho TS. Erosive tooth wear: a multifactorial condition of growing concern and increasing knowledge. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:1-15. doi:10.1159/000360380. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

  9. Luo Y, Zeng XJ, Du MQ, et al. The prevalence of dental erosion in preschool children in China. J Dent. 2005 Feb;33(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.007.

  10. Vieira A, Overweg E, Ruben JL, et al. Toothbrush abrasion, simulated tongue friction and attrition of eroded bovine enamel in vitro. J Dent. 2006 May;34(5):336-42. Epub 2005 Sep 19. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.07.010.

  11. Wetton S, Hughes J, West N, et al. Exposure time of enamel and dentine to saliva for protection against erosion: a study in vitro. Caries Res. 2006;40(3):213-7. DOI: 10.1159/000092228.

  12. Deery C, Wagner ML, Longbottom C, et al. The prevalence of dental erosion in a United States and a United Kingdom sample of adolescents. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Nov-Dec;22(6):505-10.

  13. Centerwall BC, Armstrong CW, Funkhouser LS, et al. Erosion of dental enamel among competitive swimmers at a gas-chlorinated swimming pool. Am J Epidemiol. 1986 Apr;123(4):641-7.

  14. Addy M, Shellis RP. Interaction between attrition, abrasion and erosion in tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:17-31. DOI: 10.1159/000093348.

  15. Jaeggi T, Lussi A. Prevalence, incidence and distribution of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:55-73. doi: 10.1159/000360973. Epub 2014 Jun 26. DOI: 10.1159/000360973.

  16. American College of Prosthodontists. Facts & Figures.Accessed October 7, 2020.

  17. Ganss C. Definition of erosion and links to tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:9-16. DOI: 10.1159/000093344.

  18. Lussi A, Schlueter N, Rakhmatullina E, et al. Dental Erosion – An Overview with Emphasis on Chemical and Histopathological Aspects. Caries Res. 2011;45 Suppl 1:2-12. doi: 10.1159/000325915. Epub 2011 May 31.

  19. Buzalaf MA, Kato MT, Hannas AR. The role of matrix metalloproteinases in dental erosion. Adv Dent Res. 2012 Sep;24(2):72-6. doi: 10.1177/0022034512455029.

  20. Lussi A, Schaffner M. Progression of and risk factors for dental erosion and wedge-shaped defects over a 6-year period. Caries Res. 2000 Mar-Apr;34(2):182-7. DOI: 16587.

  21. Hughes JA, West NX, Parker DM, et al. Development and evaluation of a low erosive blackcurrant juice drink in vitro and in situ 1. Comparison with orange juice. J Dent. 1999 May;27(4):285-9.

  22. Hughes JA, West NX, Parker DM, et al. Development and evaluation of a low erosive blackcurrant juice drink. 3. Final drink and concentrate, formulae comparisons in situ and overview of the concept. J Dent. 1999 Jul;27(5):345-50.

  23. Calvadini C, Siega-Riz AM, Popkin BM. US adolescent food intake trends from 1965 to 1996. Arch Dis Child. 2000 Jul;83(1):18-24.

  24. Gleason P, Suitor C. Children’s diets in the mid-1990s: Dietary intake and its relationship with school meal participation. Princeton, NJ. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. 2001.

  25. Credit Suisse. Research Institute. Sugar Consumption at a crossroads. September 2013. Accessed October 7, 2020.

  26. Per capita consumption of soft drinks in the United States from 2010 to 2014 (in gallons). Statista. Accessed March 17, 2017.

  27. Magalhães AC, Moraes SM, Rios D, et al. Effect of ion supplementation of a commercial soft drink on tooth enamel erosion. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2009 Feb;26(2):152-6. doi: 10.1080/02652030802425326.

  28. Richards D. Impact of diet on tooth erosion. Evid Based Dent. 2016 Jun;17(2):40. doi: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6401164.

  29. Zero DT, Lussi A. Behavioral Factors. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:100-05. doi: 10.1159/000093356.

  30. Jain P, Nihill P, Sobkowski J, et al. Commercial soft drinks: pH and in vitro dissolution of enamel. Gen Dent. 2007 Mar-Apr; 55(2):150-154.

  31. Kanzow P, Wegehaupt FJ, Attin T, et al. Etiology and pathogenesis of dental erosion. Quintessence Int. 2016 Apr;47(4):275-8. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a35625.

  32. Salas MM, Nascimento GG, Vargas-Ferreira F, et al. Diet influenced tooth erosion prevalence in children and adolescents: Results of a meta-analysis and meta-regression. J Dent. 2015 Aug;43(8):865-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.05.012. Epub 2015 Jun 7.

  33. Lussi A, Jaeggi T, Zero D. The role of diet in the aetiology of dental erosion. Caries Res. 2004;38 Suppl 1:34-44. DOI: 10.1159/000074360.

  34. Aykut-Yetkiner A, Wiegand A, Ronay V, et al. In vitro evaluation of the erosive potential of viscosity-modified soft acidic drinks on enamel. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Apr;18(3):769-73. doi: 10.1007/s00784-013-1037-9. Epub 2013 Jul 28.

  35. Aykut-Yetkiner A, Wiegand A, Bollhalder A, et al. Effect of acidic solution viscosity on enamel erosion. J Dent Res. 2013 Mar;92(3):289-94. doi: 10.1177/0022034512473115. Epub 2013 Jan 11.

  36. Hara AT, Lussi A, Zero DT. Biological factors. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:88-99. DOI: 10.1159/000093355.

  37. Hellwig E, Lussi A. Oral hygiene products and acidic medicines. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006;20:112-8. DOI: 10.1159/000093358.

  38. Shellis RP, Featherstone JD, Lussi A. Understanding the chemistry of dental erosion. Monog Oral Sci. 2014;25:163-79. Doi: 10.1159/000359943. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

  39. Hannig M, Fiebiger M, Güntzer M, et al. Protective effect of the in situ formed short-term salivary pellicle. Arch Oral Biol. 2004 Nov;49(11):903-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2004.05.008.

  40. Yamasaki T, Hemond C, Eisa M, Ganocy S, Fass R. The Changing Epidemiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Are Patients Getting Younger?. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;24(4):559-569. doi:10.5056/jnm18140.

  41. Shah NH, LePendu P, Bauer-Mehren A, et al. Proton pump inhibitor usage and the risk of myocardial infarction in the general population. PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0124653. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124653. eCollection 2015.

  42. Fass R, Dickman R. Clinical consequences of silent gastroesophageal reflux disease. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2006 Jun;8(3):195-201.

  43. Wilder-Smith CH, Wilder-Smith P, Kawakami-Wong H, et al. Quantification of dental erosions in patients with GERD using optical coherence tomography before and after double-blind, randomized treatment with esomeprazole or placebo. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Nov;104(11):2788-95. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.441. Epub 2009 Aug 4.

  44. Corica, Caprioglio A. Meta-analysis of the prevalence of tooth wear in primary dentition. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2014 Dec;15(4):385-8.

  45. Johnson NW. Risk markers for oral diseases. Vol. 1, Dental caries : markers of high and low risk groups and individuals. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. 1991. 266-285.

  46. Loesche WJ. Role of streptococcus mutans in dental decay. Microbiol Rev. 1986 Dec;50(4):353-80.

  47. Featherstone JD. Dental caries: a dynamic disease process. Aust Dent J. 2008 Sep;53(3):286-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00064.x.

  48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Ten Great Public Health Achievements – United States, 1990-1999. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1999 Apr 2;48(12):241-3.

  49. Featherstone JD. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999 Feb;27(1):31-40.

  50. Ganss C, Lussi A, Schlueter N. The histological features and physical properties of eroded dental hard tissues. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:99-107. doi: 10.1159/000359939. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

  51. Eversole SL, Saunders-Burkhardt K, Faller RV. Erosion protection comparison of stabilised SnF2, mixed fluoride active and SMFP/arginine-containing dentifrices. Int Dent J. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1:22-8. doi: 10.1111/idj.12099.

  52. Faller RV, Eversole SL. Enamel protection from acid challenge – benefits of marketed fluoride dentifrices. J Clin Dent. 2013;24(1):25-30.

  53. Faller RV, Eversole SL, Tzeghai GE. Enamel protection: a comparison of marketed dentifrice performance against dental erosion. Am J Dent. 2011 Aug;24(4):205-10.

  54. Eversole SL, Saunders-Burkhardt K, Faller RV. Erosion prevention potential of an over-the-counter stabilized SnF2 dentifrice compared to 5000ppm F prescription strength products. J Clin Dent. 2015;26(2):44-9.

  55. Hooper SM, Newcombe RG, Faller R, et al. The protective effects of toothpaste against erosion by orange juice: studies in situ and in vitro. J Dent. 2007 Jun;35(6):476-81. Epub 2007 Feb 27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.01.003.

  56. Huysmans MCDNJM, Jager DHJ, Ruben JL, et al. Reduction of erosive wear in situ by stannous fluoride-containing toothpaste. Caries Res. 2011;45(6):518-23. doi: 10.1159/000331391. Epub 2011 Oct 5.

  57. Bellamy PG, Harris R, Date RF, et al. In situ clinical evaluation of a stabilised, stannous fluoride dentifrice. Int Dent J. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1:43-50. doi: 10.1111/idj.12102.

  58. West NX, Seong J, Hellin N, et al. A clinical study to measure anti-erosion properties of a stabilized stannous fluoride dentifrice relative to a sodium fluoride/triclosan dentifrice. Int J Dent Hyg. 2015 Jun 22. doi: 10.1111/idh.12159. [Epub ahead of print].

  59. West NX, He T, Macdonald EL, et al. Erosion protection benefits of stabilized SnF2 dentifrice versus an arginine – sodium monofluorophosphate dentifrice: Results from in vitro and in situ clinical studies. Clin Oral Investig. 2017 Mar;21(2):533-540. doi: 10.1007/s00784-016-1905-1. Epub 2016 Aug 1.

  60. West N, Seong J, Macdonald E, et al. A randomised clinical study to measure the anti-erosion benefits of a stannous-containing sodium fluoride dentifrice. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2015 Mar-Apr;19(2):182-7. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.145817.

  61. Khambe D, Eversole SL, Mills T, et al. Protective effects of SnF2 – Part II. Deposition and retention on pellicle-coated enamel. Int Dent J. 2014 Mar;64 Suppl 1:11-5. doi: 10.1111/idj.12097.

  62. [Faller RV. Meeting the challenges of tooth sensitivity and dental erosion with stannous fluoride. Cosmetics & Toiletries. 2012; 127(5):362-371.](Faller RV. Meeting the challenges of tooth sensitivity and dental erosion with stannous fluoride. Cosmetics & Toiletries. 2012; 127(5):362-371.)

  63. Paepegaey AM, Barker ML, Bartlett DW, et al. Measuring enamel erosion: a comparative study of contact profilometry, non-contact profilometry and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Dent Mater. 2013 Dec;29(12):1265-72. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2013.09.015. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

  64. Bartlett DW, Lussi A, West NX, et al. Prevalence of tooth wear on buccal and lingual surfaces and possible risk factors in young European adults. J Dent. 2013 Nov;41(11):1007-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.018. Epub 2013 Sep 1.

  65. Carvalho TS, Lussi A, Jaeggi T, et al. Erosive tooth wear in children. Monogr Oral Sci. 2014;25:262-78. doi: 10.1159/000360712. Epub 2014 Jun 26.

  66. Carvalho TS, Colon P, Ganss C, et al. Consensus report of the European Federation of Conservative Dentistry: erosive tooth wear--diagnosis and management. Clin Oral Investig. 2015 Sep;19(7):1557-61. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1511-7. Epub 2015 Jul 1.

  67. Ganesh M, Hertzberg A, Nurko S, et al. Acid rather than nonacid reflux burden is a predictor of tooth erosion. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2016 Feb;62(2):309-13. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000927.

  68. Bartlett DW, Ganss C, Lussi A. Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Investig. 2008 Mar;12 Suppl 1:S65-8. doi: 10.1007/s00784-007-0181-5. Epub 2008 Jan 29.

  69. Van der Weijden FA, Campbell SL, Dörfer CE, et al. Safety of oscillating-rotating powered brushes compared to manual toothbrushes: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2011 Jan;82(1):5-24. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100393. Epub 2010 Sep 10.

  70. Wiegand A, Burkhard JP, Eggmann F, et al. Brushing force of manual and sonic toothbrushes affects dental hard tissue abrasion. Clin Oral Investig. 2013 Apr;17(3):815-22. doi: 10.1007/s00784-012-0788-z. Epub 2012 Jul 13.

  71. Hara AT, Ando M, Gonzales-Cabezas C, et al. Protective effect of the dental pellicle against erosive challenges in situ. J Dent Res. 2006 Jul;85(7):612-6.

Ressources additionnelles

  • Aucune ressource supplémentaire disponible
0/26Suivant